Troubled Asset Relief Program: Lifetime Cost (2024)

GAO-24-107033 Published: Dec 07, 2023. Publicly Released: Dec 07, 2023.

Jump To:

Fast Facts

Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program was created to help stabilize the U.S. financial system, restart economic growth, and prevent avoidable foreclosures during the 2008 financial crisis. TARP was originally authorized to purchase or guarantee up to $700 billion in assets to assist financial institutions and markets, businesses, and individuals.

As of September 30, 2023, when all TARP-funded programs were fully wrapped up, the total amount spent was $443.5 billion.

After repayments, sales, dividends, interest, and other income, the lifetime cost of TARP-funded programs was $31.1 billion.

Troubled Asset Relief Program: Lifetime Cost (1)

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

In October 2008, Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) in response to the financial crisis. EESA established the Office of Financial Stability (OFS) within the Department of the Treasury and created the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). TARP-funded programs were designed to assist financial institutions and markets, businesses, homeowners, and consumers.

EESA originally authorized TARP to purchase or guarantee up to $700 billion in assets. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 reduced that amount to $475 billion. By the time all TARP-funded programs concluded, on September 30, 2023, the total amount disbursed was $443.5 billion. However, after repayments, sales, dividends, interest, and other income, the lifetime cost of TARP-funded programs was $31.1 billion, significantly less than its original authorization (see figure). Further, while there will be no effect on the net cost, TARP has over $14.2 billion in unused funds that it will return to Treasury at the end of fiscal year 2025.

Lifetime Cost of TARP-Funded Programs

Troubled Asset Relief Program: Lifetime Cost (2)

OFS established several programs under TARP to help stabilize the U.S. financial system, restart economic growth, and prevent avoidable foreclosures. For example:

  • The Capital Purchase Program (CPP) was launched in October 2008 to help stabilize the financial system by providing capital to viable financial institutions. Through CPP, Treasury disbursed a total of $204.9 billion to 707 institutions in 48 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. After repayments, sales, dividends, and interest, however, the program resulted in a net gain of $16.3 billion.
  • The Community Development Capital Initiative (CDCI) was created in February 2010 to help certified community development financial institutions and the communities they serve cope with the effects of the financial crisis. Though CDCI disbursed a total of $570.1 million, the final cost of the program—after repayments, sales, dividends, and interest—was $67.5 million.
  • The Automotive Industry Financing Program (AIFP) was launched in December 2008 to help prevent the collapse of General Motors and Chrysler, which would have significantly disrupted the U.S. auto industry. AIFP disbursed $79.7 billion in loans and equity investments. After repayments, sales, dividends, and interest, the program cost a total of $12.1 billion.
  • The American International Group, Inc. (AIG) Investment Program was intended to prevent the disorderly failure of AIG, which the U.S. government concluded would have caused catastrophic damage to the nation's financial system and economy. Starting in November 2008, Treasury used TARP funds to invest $67.8 billion in AIG, helping to secure its liquidity. After repayments, sales, dividends, interest, and other income related to AIG, TARP's ultimate cost was $15.2 billion. However, Treasury also received non-TARP shares of AIG, and the $17.5 billion in proceeds it received from the sale of these shares not only offset the TARP costs but resulted in a net gain for Treasury.
  • OFS launched two housing programs—Making Home Affordable and the Hardest Hit Fund—to help struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure and stabilize the housing market. In addition, TARP provided support to the Federal Housing Administration Refinance Program, designed to assist borrowers whose homes were worth less than the remaining amounts due on their mortgage loans. Under the terms of these programs, recipients were not required to repay the government for funds they received. In total, these programs assisted more than 3.3 million homeowners and supported neighborhood improvement efforts at a final cost of $31.4 billion.
  • Various additional TARP-funded programs disbursed $59.1 billion and resulted in a net gain of $11.4 billion.

Why GAO Did This Study

EESA provided GAO with broad oversight authority to track actions related to TARP. GAO audited TARP's financial statements annually, including the costs of the individual programs, since the program's inception. For the entire 15-year duration of TARP, GAO issued unmodified (clean) opinions on its financial statements. In addition, GAO performed many other audits of TARP-funded programs and made over 70 recommendations for corrective action, most of which Treasury implemented. With the conclusion of TARP in September 2023, GAO can now summarize the ultimate cost of the program.

For more information, contact Cheryl Clark at (202) 512-3406 or ClarkCE@gao.gov.

Full Report

Full Report (2 pages)
Accessible PDF (2 pages)

GAO Contacts

Cheryl E. Clark

Director

clarkce@gao.gov

(202) 512-9377

Chuck Young

Managing Director

youngc1@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Administrative costsAssetsCommunity developmentDebtDividendsFinancial crisisFinancial stabilityFinancial institutionsHomeownershipFinancial statements

Troubled Asset Relief Program: Lifetime Cost (2024)

FAQs

How much did Troubled Asset Relief Program cost? ›

In its Report on the Troubled Asset Relief Program—April 2023, CBO projected that the TARP would cost $31 billion over its lifetime. CBO's final estimate is about the same.

How much did the TARP bailout cost? ›

TARP was originally authorized to purchase or guarantee up to $700 billion in assets to assist financial institutions and markets, businesses, and individuals. As of September 30, 2023, when all TARP-funded programs were fully wrapped up, the total amount spent was $443.5 billion.

Who benefited most from TARP repayments? ›

TARP Recipients: The TARP program provided financial assistance to many institutions, including banks, insurance companies, and automakers. Some of the biggest beneficiaries of the program were Bank of America, Citigroup, AIG, and General Motors.

How did the Troubled Asset Relief Program work? ›

The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was instituted by the U.S. Treasury following the 2008 financial crisis. TARP stabilized the financial system by having the government buy mortgage-backed securities and bank stocks. From 2008 to 2010, TARP invested $426.4 billion in firms and recouped $441.7 billion in return.

Who paid back TARP money? ›

Most banks repaid TARP funds using capital raised from the issuance of equity securities and debt not guaranteed by the federal government.

Does TARP still exist? ›

As of September 30, 2023, all TARP programs have closed. While Congress authorized $700 billion for TARP, Treasury utilized far less than that. The TARP actual lifetime cost was approximately $31.1 billion, most of which was attributable to the program's efforts to help struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure.

Did banks pay fair returns to taxpayers on TARP? ›

In sum, these results show that TARP recipients paid a considerably lower rate of return to the taxpayers compared with market benchmarks with similar or lower risk: banks' preferred equity, the S&P's preferred equity index, portfolios of preferred equity and warrants, banks' senior bonds, and banks' preferred equity ...

Did taxpayers make money on TARP? ›

The biggest part of the TARP was the bank rescue, which invested $236 billion in over 700 banks. Almost all of those investments have been resolved, most resulting in a profit for the government, though over 100 did result in losses.

Did GM pay back TARP? ›

But, the hype is not the reality. In fact, GM did not repay the loans with money it earned from selling cars. Instead, GM repaid the TARP loans with money it withdrew from another TARP fund at the Treasury Department.

Why was TARP a failure? ›

The program failed in its attempt to make successful purchases and modify mortgages to prevent foreclosure for homeowners. The problem was with the banks. The TARP program gave banks enough lending power, but the banks didn't increase lending as expected.

Why did Americans criticize the Troubled Asset Relief Program? ›

Final answer: Many Americans criticized the Troubled Asset Relief Program due to aiding those responsible for the crisis and lack of support for smaller banks.

Which of the following is a criticism of TARP? ›

One major criticism of TARP centered around executive compensation and the bonuses that were paid to top executives at a time when their companies required bailout funds. Critics argued that these “TARP bonuses” should not have been paid to businesses that were using taxpayer money to recover financially.

What banks are the government bailout? ›

As part of the plan, the government bought preferred stock in troubled banks such as Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, Bank of New York Mellon and State Street Bank. Most of the investments have since been resolved, and the government made a profit off of many of them.

What is the FDR relief program? ›

If you sign up for Freedom Debt Relief's program, its negotiators commit to settling your eligible unsecured debt for less than what you owe. Depositing funds. Each month, you put money into an FDIC-insured program account that you control.

What is the difference between the troubled assets relief program TARP and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act? ›

Which of the following is a difference between the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act? TARP was a $700 billion economic bailout plan, whereas the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was an $825 billion economic stimulus package.

How much did the U.S. Congress allocate to the Troubled Asset Relief Program in 2008? ›

Although Congress initially authorized $700 billion for TARP in October 2008, that authority was reduced to $475 billion by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act).

Did AIG repay bailout money? ›

AIG finished repaying the full $182.3 billion bailout in December 2012, leaving taxpayers with a nearly $23 billion profit.

Why did many Americans criticize the Troubled Asset Relief Program it did not provide aid? ›

Explanation: Many Americans criticized the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) for various reasons: It helped those who had caused the economic crisis, bailing out banks and institutions involved in toxic securities. It did not provide enough aid to smaller banks, leading to many of them collapsing.

Why was TARP controversial? ›

As with most government programs, TARP also sparked criticism. Some opponents believe too much money was pumped into the plan and that funds weren't used wisely. Critics also say the program gave banks a free pass for their financial mismanagement.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Van Hayes

Last Updated:

Views: 6014

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (46 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Van Hayes

Birthday: 1994-06-07

Address: 2004 Kling Rapid, New Destiny, MT 64658-2367

Phone: +512425013758

Job: National Farming Director

Hobby: Reading, Polo, Genealogy, amateur radio, Scouting, Stand-up comedy, Cryptography

Introduction: My name is Van Hayes, I am a thankful, friendly, smiling, calm, powerful, fine, enthusiastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.