The Rise and Fall of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) (2024)

How the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Impacted Real Estate

Simply put, Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was a $700 billion bailout program in 2008 authorized by Congress through the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 with the purpose of mending the financial situation of banks, housing, global credit markets and restoring market stability.

History of Troubled Asset Relief Program

In 2008, Americans experienced the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. This economic crisis led to a troubled financial situation within the housing and banking industry. The housing industry experienced a massive number of foreclosures, and the banking industry was at the brink of collapse. Even global markets such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and American International Group (AIG) experienced serious financial problems and almost came to a standstill.

To keep the banking industry operating under this crisis, and prevent the economy from spiraling out of control, President George W. Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 into law.

TARP was signed into law to strengthen market stability and to improve the financial situation of the banking, housing, and the auto industry by purchasing stocks in eight major banks (Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, State Street), auto industry and insurance companies. Loan funds were also made available to financial institutions and homeowners to prevent foreclosures and short sales.

How the Troubled Asset Relief Program Worked

The Troubled Asset Relief Program worked by making funds and equity investments available in key troubled assets to stabilize financial institutions, housing sector, automobile industry and the global market. Through TARP, funding was made available to keep credit flowing for consumers and businesses to stabilize a collapsing economy and prevent a second major depression.

By organizing bailouts in five major areas — automotive, banking, credit, housing and insurance industries — TARP was able to provide liquidity within these markets and recover the economy. From 2008 to 2010, TARP invested $475 billion in these industries by purchasing stock in banks, insurance companies, and the auto industry. Funding in the form of loans was also made available to financial institutions and homeowners.

The following were the allocations within the TARP program:

  • $259 billion was allocated to provide cash flow to banks.
  • $70 billion was dedicated to stabilize the auto industry.
  • $27 billion was dedicated to restart credit banks.
  • $70 to bolster the American International Group (AIG).
  • $46 billion was dedicated to the Credit and Housing sector to help Americans avoid foreclosure.

The Problem With the TARP Program for Homeowners

TARP was created to restore the economy by infusing funds into the banking, auto, housing, and money markets. However, the TARP bailout still failed homeowners.

The program failed in its attempt to make successful purchases and modify mortgages to prevent foreclosure for homeowners. The problem was with the banks. The TARP program gave banks enough lending power, but the banks didn’t increase lending as expected. They were too wary that the bailout program might not work, so they cherry-picked applicants and refused to consider those with lower equity. Out of the 4 million foreclosures that TARP was proposed to prevent, just fewer than 800,000 foreclosures were avoided before the end of 2010 when the TARP program expired. By the end of year 2010, about 2.9 million homes had received foreclosure filings.

Lessons Learned

The TARP program was aimed to counter the financial crisis and restore financial stability to troubled assets by having the government buy mortgage-backed securities and bank stocks. TARP did manage to stabilize financial institutions. But, it still failed to stem the foreclosure crisis at that time.

It is difficult to argue if TARP was a failure or a success. The case with TARP was complicated at the time and its effectiveness will continue to be debated and analyzed for years to come.

The Rise and Fall of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) (2024)

FAQs

What did the Troubled Asset Relief Program TARP do? ›

The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was instituted by the U.S. Treasury following the 2008 financial crisis. TARP stabilized the financial system by having the government buy mortgage-backed securities and bank stocks. From 2008 to 2010, TARP invested $426.4 billion in firms and recouped $441.7 billion in return.

What did the Troubled Asset Relief Program TARP work to do? ›

TARP helped prevent a second Great Depression, stabilized a collapsing financial system, and restarted the markets that provide mortgage, auto, student, and business loans.

What were the results of TARP? ›

About 70 percent of the disbursem*nts went to support financial institutions. All told, those transactions yielded a net gain to the government. Net disbursem*nts of TARP funds for all mortgage programs were $31.4 billion.

Were TARP funds repaid? ›

Most banks repaid TARP funds using capital raised from the issuance of equity securities and debt not guaranteed by the federal government.

What was the purpose of the TARP? ›

Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program was created to help stabilize the U.S. financial system, restart economic growth, and prevent avoidable foreclosures during the 2008 financial crisis.

How did the TARP fail? ›

TARP was created to restore the economy by infusing funds into the banking, auto, housing, and money markets. However, the TARP bailout still failed homeowners. The program failed in its attempt to make successful purchases and modify mortgages to prevent foreclosure for homeowners. The problem was with the banks.

When did the TARP program end? ›

During fiscal year 2023, OFS completed the wind down of its remaining housing programs under TARP and sold its last troubled assets from the Capital Purchase Program and Community Development Capital Initiative.

Which group did TARP target primarily? ›

Which group did TARP target primarily? TARP bailouts to banks and financial institutions very unpopular with the people, because... some banks were still profiting while individual people were getting no benefit. What crisis is the new President facing?

Who benefited most from TARP? ›

TARP Recipients: The TARP program provided financial assistance to many institutions, including banks, insurance companies, and automakers. Some of the biggest beneficiaries of the program were Bank of America, Citigroup, AIG, and General Motors.

What were some positive results of TARP? ›

Final answer: TARP ensured the survival of banks and the automobile industry, and increased lending capacity in the financial system. It was not designed to let industries keep loan money without repayment or let the finance industry collapse.

What was the goal of the TARP quizlet? ›

TARP is intended to improve the liquidity of these assets by purchasing them using secondary market mechanisms, thus allowing participating institutions to stabilize their balance sheets and avoid further losses.

What did the Troubled Asset Relief Program TARP worked to brainly? ›

Final answer:

The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was a program implemented to rescue failing banks and stabilize the financial system during the financial crisis of 2007-2008. It also supported the automotive industry to save factory jobs in high-unemployment areas.

Which banks got TARP money? ›

Through the TARP, around $245 billion in taxpayer money was used to stabilize more than 700 banks. As part of the plan, the government bought preferred stock in troubled banks such as Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, Bank of New York Mellon and State Street Bank.

Did banks pay fair returns to taxpayers on TARP? ›

In sum, these results show that TARP recipients paid a considerably lower rate of return to the taxpayers compared with market benchmarks with similar or lower risk: banks' preferred equity, the S&P's preferred equity index, portfolios of preferred equity and warrants, banks' senior bonds, and banks' preferred equity ...

Are government bailouts paid back? ›

The bailout support can come in the form of cash that does not have to be paid back, loans with favorable terms for the entity receiving the funds, bonds, and stock purchases.

Did taxpayers make money on TARP? ›

The biggest part of the TARP was the bank rescue, which invested $236 billion in over 700 banks. Almost all of those investments have been resolved, most resulting in a profit for the government, though over 100 did result in losses.

Who benefited the most from TARP? ›

TARP Recipients: The TARP program provided financial assistance to many institutions, including banks, insurance companies, and automakers. Some of the biggest beneficiaries of the program were Bank of America, Citigroup, AIG, and General Motors.

What are the effects of TARP? ›

TARP had both positive and negative effects on the banking industry and financial regulation. While it helped to prevent a total economic collapse and spurred increased regulation of the financial sector, it also had some negative effects such as incentivizing risk-taking.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Margart Wisoky

Last Updated:

Views: 5998

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Margart Wisoky

Birthday: 1993-05-13

Address: 2113 Abernathy Knoll, New Tamerafurt, CT 66893-2169

Phone: +25815234346805

Job: Central Developer

Hobby: Machining, Pottery, Rafting, Cosplaying, Jogging, Taekwondo, Scouting

Introduction: My name is Margart Wisoky, I am a gorgeous, shiny, successful, beautiful, adventurous, excited, pleasant person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.