What techniques can you use to evaluate solution feasibility? (2024)

The first technique is to define the criteria that you will use to measure the feasibility of a solution. Criteria are the standards or requirements that a solution must meet to be considered feasible. For example, some common criteria are cost, time, quality, risk, impact, and alignment with goals. You can also use specific criteria that are relevant to your context, such as customer satisfaction, environmental sustainability, or legal compliance. By defining the criteria, you can clarify what you expect from a solution and how you will compare different options.

The second technique is to conduct research to gather relevant information and data about the solution and its context. Research can help you understand the current situation, the needs and preferences of the stakeholders, the available resources and constraints, and the potential outcomes and implications of the solution. You can use various methods of research, such as surveys, interviews, observations, experiments, or literature reviews. By conducting research, you can validate your assumptions, identify gaps and opportunities, and support your decisions with evidence.

The third technique is to perform analysis to evaluate the solution against the criteria and the research findings. Analysis can help you quantify and qualify the feasibility of a solution, as well as identify its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. You can use various tools and techniques of analysis, such as cost-benefit analysis, SWOT analysis, risk analysis, or feasibility matrix. By performing analysis, you can compare and contrast different solutions, weigh the pros and cons, and determine the trade-offs and compromises.

The fourth technique is to test prototypes to simulate and observe the solution in action. Prototypes are simplified versions or models of the solution that can be used to demonstrate its functionality, usability, and desirability. You can use various forms of prototypes, such as sketches, mock-ups, wireframes, or minimum viable products. By testing prototypes, you can collect feedback from the users, stakeholders, or experts, as well as identify and resolve any issues or errors before implementing the solution.

The fifth technique is to review the results of the previous techniques and make a final judgment on the feasibility of the solution. Reviewing the results can help you summarize and synthesize the information and data that you have collected and analyzed, as well as highlight the key findings and recommendations. You can use various methods of reviewing the results, such as reports, presentations, or dashboards. By reviewing the results, you can communicate your conclusions and rationale, as well as justify your choice of solution.

The sixth technique is to monitor and evaluate the solution after it has been implemented and see if it meets the criteria and the expectations. Monitoring and evaluating the solution can help you measure its performance, impact, and outcomes, as well as identify any deviations, challenges, or improvements. You can use various indicators and metrics to monitor and evaluate the solution, such as key performance indicators, customer feedback, or return on investment. By monitoring and evaluating the solution, you can ensure its sustainability, effectiveness, and efficiency, as well as learn from the experience and apply the lessons to future solutions.

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Critical Thinking

+ Follow

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.