We ran a poll recently that asked linkedin is ‘time in’ or ‘timing’ the market was better. See below.
There is a lot of talk in the headlines of property markets crashing, so I thought it might be interesting to see if people think there is a perfect, or best time to buy?
Yes, prices have fallen in the pas 10 months, but is that the full picture? To understand the future let’s take a look at the past…
Average UK house prices:
1950 - £1,900
1960 - £2,500 31%
1970 - £4,000 60%
1980 - £23,000 475%
1990 - £57,000 48%
2000 - £89,000 56%
2010 - £170,000 91%
2020 - £249,000 46%
Average growth rate per decade of 55% (ignoring the 475% anomaly decade). What do prices look like over the next 30 years if this continues?
2030 - £386,000 55%
2040 - £598,000 55%
2050 - £927,000 55%
Firstly, what is market timing?
Market timing is an investment strategy of timing the sale or purchase of shares to maximise returns or minimise losses. Thus, market timing may be generally associated with a "buy low, sell high" strategy. For example, if an investor believed that stocks were due for a correction, they may choose to sell shares of their equity investments to protect a gain or prevent a loss.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Where Market Timing Fails
The problem with market timing is that it's extremely difficult to implement correctly and consistently. This is especially true with extreme market timing tactics, such as moving a majority of one's investment assets to cash to avoid a bear market or other major market correction.
By trying to predict the best time to buy and sell, you may miss the market's biggest days. Since the highest gains often occur during or soon after a correction, such as a bear market, missing these gains may potentially cut the average returns of an investment portfolio in half over time.
Historic Evidence That Time in the Market Beats Timing the Market
For historic evidence that time in the market beats timing the market, there is no shortage of studies on market timing and its potential pitfalls. For example, a recent study concludes that missing just a handful of the best days in the market can drastically reduce an investor's average returns over time.
The following data includes key findings from the study, which demonstrates the growth of $10,000 in the S&P 500 from Dec. 31, 2006, to Dec. 31, 2021:
Staying Invested Vs. Missing the Best Days in the Market
If you: Your balance would be: Your return would be:
Stayed invested for 15 years $45,682 10.66%
Missed the 10 best days $20,929 5.05%
Missed the 20 best days $12,671 1.59%
Missed the 30 best days $8,365 -1.18%
Missed the 40 best days $5,786 -3.58%
Source: Putnam Investments
Key takeaways from the table above:
What does this mean?
Time in the market generally beats timing the market because many of the best days in the market occur during or immediately following downturns. Based on historical returns over the past 15 years, missing the 10 best days in the market each year would have cut your returns in half.
While it can be tempting to try and avoid the worst days in the market, it's nearly impossible to avoid the worst days and capture the best days. As an alternative to market timing, an aggressive investor with a high tolerance for risk may choose to stay invested during downturns and dollar-cost average more heavily in their equity investments during this period.
Human nature;
Its also very difficult to take our human brains out of the equation, often, when we are hearing about a market booming, it is too late, and many of the best returns have been made. Therefore, unless you are a professional, or have heaps of time on your hands, its better to consistently buy or ‘dollar cost average’ and let time in the market do it’s thing.
Don’t get sucked in either way, and stick to your plan - this is where clear goals help.
If you would like any more information on how we help our clients create plans that maximise ‘time in’ the market then please get in touch.
